Sensaka AI Data Center Operations Management Platform

    AI Infrastructure CMDB and Impact Analysis

    Connect every facility, GPU, workload, service and owner.

    The Sensaka AI Infrastructure CMDB replaces disconnected asset lists with a live relationship model for AI data center operations. It connects physical infrastructure, compute capacity, operational activity, people and business services so teams can understand what an asset is, where it is, what it supports, who owns it and what may be affected when it fails.

    The Problem

    A Static Asset List Cannot Explain AI Infrastructure

    Traditional asset inventories record devices, serial numbers and locations. AI infrastructure operations require a broader and more dynamic view.

    A single GPU can be part of a physical server, assigned to a resource pool, allocated to a container, consumed by a training or inference workload, associated with a project and connected to a service used by a business team.

    When these relationships are maintained in separate tools, operators struggle to answer basic questions during an incident:

    Which workload is using this GPU?
    Which model service runs on this node?
    Which project and department will be affected?
    Who owns the service and who should respond?
    What changed before the problem appeared?

    Sensaka builds the relationship context needed to answer these questions.

    Data Model

    Model the Five Dimensions of AI Data Center Operations

    The Sensaka CMDB organizes AI infrastructure around five connected dimensions.

    People

    Record responsible owners, operations teams, tenants, suppliers, roles and permissions. Associate infrastructure and services with the people accountable for them.

    Physical Infrastructure

    Manage facilities, rooms, racks, rack units, servers, accelerator cards, networks, storage systems, power equipment and liquid cooling infrastructure.

    Operational Activity

    Connect scheduling activity, training and inference workloads, alarms, service tickets, changes, inspections and maintenance records.

    Compute Capacity

    Model clusters, nodes, resource pools, specifications, quotas, assigned capacity and available capacity.

    Business Services

    Associate model services, inference instances, applications, agents, projects and business departments with the infrastructure they consume.

    Together, these five dimensions create an operational model that is more useful than a device inventory alone.

    Data Freshness

    Automatically Keep Infrastructure Data Current

    AI infrastructure changes continuously. New equipment is installed, accelerator cards are replaced, workloads move, containers restart and resource assignments change.

    Sensaka uses infrastructure discovery and configuration synchronization to reduce dependence on manual updates. Supported device, BMC, Kubernetes and infrastructure interfaces can provide current configuration and relationship data. The platform can record:

    Device and component inventory
    GPU and NPU model, quantity and node location
    Facility, rack and rack unit location
    Cluster, node and resource pool membership
    Workload, container and accelerator allocation
    Project, tenant and owner association
    Configuration changes and operational history

    Authority rules and conflict handling should be agreed during implementation so teams know which source is trusted when automated discovery and manual records differ.

    Relationship Graph

    Manage Physical and Logical Relationships Together

    AI infrastructure includes both physical and logical dependency chains.

    Physical Relationships

    Facility, rack, server, slot, accelerator, network port, storage connection, power path and cooling location.

    Logical Relationships

    Cluster, resource pool, container, workload, model service, application, project and owner.

    Sensaka brings these relationships into a common graph so operators can move between the physical and logical views of the same service. For example, an operator can begin with a slow inference service, locate its instance and container, identify the GPU and node, review network and storage dependencies, and then examine the physical server and hardware health.

    Impact Analysis

    Understand Business Impact Before Taking Action

    When an accelerator, node or infrastructure component reports a problem, Sensaka can use the relationship graph to help determine the likely impact scope.

    Look Upward to Services and Business Context

    Identify affected model services, inference instances, applications, projects and business departments. Where service commitments are recorded, the impact view can include the relevant service level context.

    Look Downward to Infrastructure Evidence

    Review accelerator, node and component status, then correlate network, storage, temperature and hardware health data around the event.

    Look Across to Responsibility and Workflow

    Identify the responsible owner or operations team and create a response ticket with the affected objects and investigation context attached.

    This creates a clearer transition from an infrastructure alarm to a business aware operational response.

    Change History

    Track Changes and Reconstruct the Past

    Configuration changes can explain performance problems and failures, but only when the history is available. Sensaka records changes with the previous and new values, the operator or discovery source, and the effective time. Historical snapshots help teams reconstruct the state of an asset and its relationships at an earlier point.

    Incident investigation Configuration drift analysis Audit and compliance review Change validation Capacity and lifecycle planning Comparison of infrastructure state before and after an event
    Common Use Cases

    Where AI Infrastructure CMDB Fits

    GPU Failure Impact Analysis

    Start with an accelerator alarm. Identify the node, container, workload, model service, project and owner connected to the affected card. Review related temperature, power, ECC, network and storage information before assigning the response.

    Slow Inference Service Investigation

    Begin with the affected service and move downward through the instance, container, GPU and physical node. Determine whether the service degradation aligns with resource, hardware or infrastructure conditions.

    AI Infrastructure Asset Reconciliation

    Compare discovered server and accelerator configuration with the CMDB record. Identify missing assets, configuration changes or location inconsistencies.

    Change and Audit Review

    Review who changed an asset or relationship, when it changed and how the change was discovered. Reconstruct the configuration state at the time of an incident.

    Responsibility Mapping

    Associate clusters, resource pools, projects and services with owners and operations teams so incidents can be routed without searching through separate contact lists.

    Delivery to Operations Handover

    After a server is provisioned, register it in the CMDB, add it to monitoring and connect it to the correct facility, cluster and resource relationships.

    Key Capabilities

    Everything the Relationship Model Needs

    People, physical infrastructure, activity, compute and business modeling
    Automatic discovery and configuration synchronization
    Component level GPU and NPU inventory
    Facility, rack and rack unit management
    Physical and logical relationship graph
    Workload, container, GPU and node mapping
    Project, tenant, service and owner association
    Change history and historical snapshot reconstruction
    Upward service and business impact analysis
    Downward infrastructure and hardware investigation
    Responsibility mapping and service ticket creation
    Integration with monitoring, scheduling, metering and operational workflows according to project scope
    Why Sensaka

    Deep Physical Infrastructure Visibility, Built In

    Sensaka combines CMDB capabilities with deep physical infrastructure visibility. The platform can use device management interfaces, BMC data, accelerator telemetry, Kubernetes information, network data and operational records to keep the model connected to the running environment.

    This is particularly important in AI data centers because the dependency chain spans facilities, hardware, software platforms and business services. A relationship model built only from cloud or application data may miss the physical component, power, cooling and location context required for complete impact analysis.

    Implementation Principles

    A Useful CMDB Depends on Governance as Much as Technology

    During implementation, Sensaka and the customer should define:

    01Configuration item types and required attributes
    02Unique identifiers for facilities, devices, components and services
    03Trusted data sources and conflict resolution rules
    04Ownership and responsibility fields
    05Relationship discovery and maintenance rules
    06Change retention and audit requirements
    07Service level and business impact labels
    08Integration boundaries with existing CMDB, ITSM and monitoring systems
    FAQ

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What makes an AI infrastructure CMDB different from a traditional CMDB?

    It includes accelerator cards, clusters, resource pools, containers, AI workloads, model services and their relationships with physical data center infrastructure. It must represent both fast changing logical allocations and long lived physical assets.

    Can Sensaka discover GPUs automatically?

    Sensaka can collect accelerator inventory and node relationships from supported hardware and software interfaces. The exact fields and update frequency depend on the vendors and management interfaces available.

    Does the CMDB replace our existing enterprise CMDB?

    It can operate as the AI infrastructure data foundation or integrate with an existing enterprise CMDB. The correct architecture depends on data ownership, system boundaries and the customer's current processes.

    Can the platform show which business service is affected by a GPU failure?

    Yes, when the required relationships from GPU to node, workload, model service, project and business service are complete. Impact analysis quality depends on the completeness and accuracy of those relationships.

    Can we review historical configurations?

    Sensaka supports change history and point in time snapshot reconstruction for managed configuration data. Retention and detail should be defined during implementation.

    Can an impact analysis create an ITSM ticket?

    Sensaka can associate the responsible team and initiate a service ticket through the available workflow or ITSM integration. The exact routing and approval process is configured for the customer environment.

    Get Started

    Turn Infrastructure Data into Operational Context

    Know what every asset supports, who owns it and what will be affected before the next action is taken.

    Related: AI Infrastructure Observability, GPU Usage Metering, Liquid Cooling Monitoring